Sometimes, when we attempt to comprehend a film, we lose sight of the experience of the film itself. As a certified non-expert in the film field, and in any field for that matter, this is an old concept. The vast majority of people are of the mindset of “Stop talking and just watch the fucking movie.” I’m a part of that boat, but also on the same boat that argues any form of art demands to be analyzed and critiqued: that without critique, we run the risk of being drawn, like Romero zombies, into relentless propaganda, capitalism, racism, sexism, transphobia, and all of the other things film has been wonderfully expressive of since its invention.
What I’m trying to say is, like any film, Portrait of a Lady on Fire deserves critique and analysis. But, as a queer, feminine person, I have no critiques to offer. It is, simply and without a doubt, a beautiful celebration of the female gaze, female love, and holy shit the visuals are fucking gorgeous. Just, just watch it.
Portrait of a Lady on Fire (2019)
undone by her gaze
and by her hands
undone by embers
blazing on hems
lifting cloth from
her mouth unveiling
lips designed
for dismantling
her every nerve
electric
bury her beneath
the waves of soft-
ness undone by
19th century
sensibilities
wrap her arms
around her waist
beg her to stay
and fall asleep
thinking god
i’m so
fucking gay

I know this was more of side thought to your post here, but I was interested in your comments about how we engage with films (or other media)—whether to just appreciate or whether to analyze in some way. We’re moving into reviews next week after all….
LikeLike